Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#5179 closed defect (fixed)
modeller refine off by one?
Reported by: | Elaine Meng | Owned by: | Eric Pettersen |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | |
Component: | Structure Editing | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
Notify when closed: | Platform: | all | |
Project: | ChimeraX |
Description
commands:
open 1www
sequence chain /V
modeller refine 1/V:1:10-16 adjacent 0
attached session with :10-16 selected (same as positions 10-16 in sequence) looks like :11-17 were modeled instead.
Attachments (2)
Change History (5)
by , 4 years ago
Attachment: | refine.cxs added |
---|
comment:1 by , 4 years ago
by , 4 years ago
Attachment: | refine2.cxs added |
---|
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Fixed the first case; the second has something to do with adjusting the numbering to compensate for the preceding chains and will require more work.
comment:3 by , 4 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Second case now also fixed.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
open 1www
seq chain /x
seq chain /v
modeller loops 1/X:1:67-72 1/V:1:84,103 adjacent 2 num 3
The parts that are modeled don't seem to bear any resemblance to the positions I specified in this example.
The structure chain V numbering is exactly the same as in the sequence, for example, but there are no differences at 84,103. Instead it looks like chain V residues at about 90-92 and 108-112 are modeled. ???
Will attach another session refine2.cxs containing the results of the commands above.