Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#3105 closed defect (fixed)
addh wrong hydrogen name on glycosylated Asn residues
Reported by: | Elaine Meng | Owned by: | pett |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | moderate | Milestone: | |
Component: | Structure Editing | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | tic20@…, asarnow@… | |
Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
Notify when closed: | Platform: | all | |
Project: | ChimeraX |
Description
When the asparagine is glycosylated, since there is only one hydrogen added to the sidechain N it gets named HD2, whereas the template hydrogen names are HD21 and HD22. An example structure with hydrogens on glycosylated Asn is 1ah1 (has name HD21). An example for testing addh with both glycosylated and unglycosylated asparagines is 5o4o.
There may be analogous situations but I can't think of any off the top of my head. Serines and tyrosines may be O-glycosylated, but then addh won't add any hydrogens to that oxygen anyway.
Daniel Asarnow reports that the name HD2 causes problems in Phenix.
<http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimerax-users/2020-April/001073.html>
Change History (7)
follow-up: 2 comment:2 by , 5 years ago
Just want to confirm, editing to HD21 results in the expected behavior. Best, -da On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:23 AM ChimeraX <ChimeraX-bugs-admin@cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:
comment:3 by , 5 years ago
Status: | assigned → accepted |
---|
If I compare the names that ChimeraX uses when adding hydrogens to NAG (e.g. /A:1547 in 6jx7) to those from an NMR structure that already has hydrogens (e.g. /A:132 in 1ah1), they are the same. Perhaps ChimeraX goes astray when the structure geometry is so bad that it adds the wrong number of hydrogens to various NAG atoms?
follow-up: 4 comment:4 by , 5 years ago
Oh - sorry. Good to know the sugar hydrogen names do come out right. That’s what comes of making assumptions... this does become a problem in general with many ligands, though.
follow-up: 5 comment:5 by , 5 years ago
Just another piece of information, in my case the NAG and ASN here are simulated successfully in Isolde. -da On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:18 PM ChimeraX <ChimeraX-bugs-admin@cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:
follow-up: 6 comment:6 by , 5 years ago
Yeah - ISOLDE (well... OpenMM, really) doesn’t actually care about atom names. Atoms are matched to the MD residue template according to the bond topology (which is good, because different MD forcefields do wildly different things with atom names).
comment:7 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | accepted → closed |
Fixed in the next daily build. Might put an AddH 1.0.1 bundle on the Toolshed for the 1.0 release.