Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#2261 closed defect (fixed)
mmCIF metal coordination of TEW
Reported by: | pett | Owned by: | Greg Couch |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | moderate | Milestone: | |
Component: | Input/Output | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
Notify when closed: | Platform: | all | |
Project: | ChimeraX |
Description
In 4oua, the bonds to the tungstens should be metal coordination bonds rather than covalent bonds. I don't know how the mmCIF reader decides on coordination bonds, but the PDB reader gets this right whereas the mmCIF reader doesn't. We don't want oxygens with 3+ covalent bonds.
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
Priority: | blocker → moderate |
---|
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Used to do metal coordination pass if there were ambiguous residues, like HEM. Now do it if there is a metal atom in the residue template.