| 311 | | Phil, Philip, Darrell (first 40 mins); Scooter, Greg, Elaine, Eric, TomG |
| 312 | | |
| 313 | | Darrell: is SOW proposal a la carte? Scooter: let's assume so for now, until/unless there is a problem of separability |
| | 311 | Phil, Philip, Meghan, Kristen, Darrell (first 40 mins); Scooter, Greg, Elaine, Eric, TomG |
| | 312 | |
| | 313 | SOW proposal (NTT data) |
| | 314 | |
| | 315 | Darrell: is it a la carte? Scooter: let's assume so for now, until/unless a problem of separability arises. (We view it on Phil's shared screen) |
| | 316 | |
| | 317 | Darrell (unfortunately our copy is numbered differently): |
| | 318 | Highest: 2 (3d pipeline dev),4 (multiperson VR),8b (docs),9 (admin) |
| | 319 | High: 3a (investigate simple ITK), 5d (browse hubmap datasets) |
| | 320 | Medium: 1 (general NIAID use cases),3bc (seg web services, reading seg formats),8a (workshops),6 (dicom) |
| | 321 | Low: 5abc (hubmap viz tools, UI clustering, light microscopy analysis), 7 ("hasp" homology modeling pipeline at their website) |