Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of NIAID2023


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 15, 2023, 2:10:55 PM (2 years ago)
Author:
Elaine Meng
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • NIAID2023

    v9 v10  
    4141 a. Submit monthly written reports of accomplishments
    4242
     43== 7/6/2023 ==
     44
     45next NIAID meeting
     46
    4347== 6/15/2023 ==
    4448
     
    5559Phil: to me, long calculations are OK as along as the user's expectations are managed.  Darrell: I agree, the expectations for a website like NIH3D can be different than for an interactive program like ChimeraX.  Still, we don't want ridiculously huge files that many will not be able to handle. Kristen: in situations where we have to re-run everything, multiday calculations are less feasible.  May also need to warn users specifically that processing will take a long time, and have some kind of indicator to us as pipeline developers that the process is still running/proceeding rather than hung.
    5660
    57 Elaine: the hard part is the nitty gritty of setting the rules and boundaries. Darrell:
     61Elaine: the hard part is the nitty gritty of setting the rules and boundaries. Darrell: we will need to work on that on our end.
    5862
    5963Kristen: can we change these parameters?  Elaine: they are command options. Phil: I see the preset-generated commands and then make variations on those commands and try them. TomG: I would edit the python in the bundle files. Try it on a set of test cases and evaluate the results.  Eric: we should address the problem systems, make sure the appropriate grid size is used (wrong sizes found by Phil), have Kristen apply decimation and see the results, see if TomG can speed up surface calculation, and decide on sharpBoundaries true or false.  Phil: advantage to false is smaller files.  Eric: maybe true for visualization presets, false for printing presets.  Kristen: I should take a look at decimation for both sharp true and sharp false, see what happens to those boundaries.