Changes between Version 46 and Version 47 of NIAID2022

Timestamp:

Jan 26, 2023, 2:13:09 PM (3 years ago)

Author:

Elaine Meng

Comment:

--

NIAID2022

@@ -86 +86 @@
 Eric: again an EBI assembly file for NMR structure. Greg: something about disjoint sets of atoms?  TomG: works in daily build.  Greg: was same problem as another ticket that has been fixed.  Will close ticket.
 
-Meghan: haptic feedback on hydrophobic/hydrophilic or ESP? Elaine: need something with a gradient, and also we don't have a full interaction energy calculation (e.g. no VDW/steric component), so it wouldn't be very helpful for manual ligand docking.  Maybe fitting atoms into density?  TomG: this is just a vibration, not a force, so may not be very helpful/intuitive.
+Meghan: haptic feedback on hydrophobic/hydrophilic or ESP? Elaine: need something with a gradient, and also we don't have a full interaction energy calculation (e.g. no VDW/steric component), so it wouldn't be very helpful for manual ligand docking.  Maybe fitting atoms into density?  TomG: this is just a vibration, not a force, so may not be very helpful/intuitive.  Scooter: maybe number of contacts/clashes could translate to strength of vibration.  Eric: will have to see if the continually updating clashes would slow down VR rendering.
+
+Darrell: maybe SOW could say "investigate utility of haptics" and maybe it could be part of a paper on pedagogical benefits of VR.  Darrell: if some type of haptic feedback is associated with popular VR hardware, more people would have it.  Whereas something like Phantom with a more complete haptic interaction is expensive and very few users would have access.
+
+Scooter: we will work on the writeup and get back to you, hopefully to have time to refine in our meeting next week.
 
 == 1/19/2023 ==