Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #8446, comment 7
- Timestamp:
- Feb 6, 2023, 2:04:36 PM (3 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #8446, comment 7
initial v1 1 1 This structure seems to have been deposited with no secondary structure information despite having (according to DSSP) close to 90000 helix residues and over 800 strand residues. If the secondary structure information had been present in the file then this problem would have been moot -- DSSP would not have been run. Is this something we should complain to the RCSB about? 2 2 3 DSSP being slow on large structures is a known issue and is on one of my lower priority to-do lists. The priority isn't high because the only place you usually run into this is using MatchMaker, which by default does not use the deposited secondary structure information. For ribbons, people typically don't look at them for these huge structure since they just look like a ball of yarn, and they're normally fast anyway because the secondary structure info is in the file.3 DSSP being slow on large structures is a known issue and is on one of my lower priority to-do lists. The priority isn't high because the only place you usually run into this is using !MatchMaker, which by default does not use the deposited secondary structure information. For ribbons, people typically don't look at them for these huge structure since they just look like a ball of yarn, and they're normally fast anyway because the secondary structure info is in the file. 4 4