Changes between Version 85 and Version 86 of Release1.4


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 15, 2009, 11:30:25 AM (17 years ago)
Author:
pett
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Release1.4

    v85 v86  
    2323  * (search other databases such as NR? PSI-BLAST on NR?) Ticket #7170
    2424 1. Support PDB v3.2 Ticket #7056
     25 1. Annotations submenu in Select menu #7190
    2526
    2627== Features Desired for 1.4 ==
     
    5051
    5152=== Core 4 (Tools for Integrated Sequence/Structure Analysis) ===
    52  1. allow specifying "sequence to add" by accession code (Uniprot?). Its feature annotations would automatically come along as regions.  Ticket #7186
    53   * would we want Fetch by ID for sequences? (would we want a sequence with no structure and not aligned with any other sequences?)
    54   * perhaps allow specifying Uniprot accession or BLAST on Uniprot for existing sequences, retrieve and load feature annotations as sequence regions (would require global alignment to Uniprot sequence for correct mapping of features when the existing sequence is not identical)
    55   * on my secondary MAV to-do list. EFP
     53 1. ~~allow specifying "sequence to add" by accession code (Uniprot?). Its feature annotations would automatically come along as regions.~~  Ticket #7186 ; mutated into "Annotations submenu" above as 1.4 release priority (still wanted as a feature, just not milestoned for 1.4)
     54  * ~~would we want Fetch by ID for sequences? (would we want a sequence with no structure and not aligned with any other sequences?)~~
     55  * ~~perhaps allow specifying Uniprot accession or BLAST on Uniprot for existing sequences, retrieve and load feature annotations as sequence regions (would require global alignment to Uniprot sequence for correct mapping of features when the existing sequence is not identical)~~
     56  * ~~on my secondary MAV to-do list. EFP~~
    5657 1. When aligning in a structure sequence, consider secondary structure markups of non-structure sequences Ticket #7187
    5758 1. If gaps are created while adding a sequence, make corresponding gaps in any markups Ticket #7188