> On Nov 22, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Elaine Meng <meng at cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote: > > I mapped your value 1.92 to actual radius 0.0384 and your value 2.17 to actual radius 0.0434 (20% as large) Obviously, that is 2%, not 20% ! Definitely much smaller, which was the main point. Elaine