[Chimera-users] on chimera unit cell function

Elaine Meng meng at cgl.ucsf.edu
Tue Jan 31 10:19:32 PST 2017

Hi Smith,
The Unit Cell results for a structure with and without “pack” are equivalent because the symmetry describes a repeating pattern: each single copy could be shown in any of several places around the first copy.  In other words, as I said before, there are multiple equally correct ways of presenting the same information. 

Although I cannot spend a lot of time looking at your specific data, I see the 3 structures are all the same space group with similar unit cell dimensions and angles, and the paper says “we could present nucleotide-induced conformational changes in the same crystal lattice by eliminating possible artificial structural differences because of different crystal packing.”  Therefore I infer that the crystal packing is approximately the same in the 3 structures.  It cannot be EXACTLY the same, however, since there are conformational changes between the structures.

Since I didn’t write the Unit Cell code or look at the symmetry matrices in detail, I don’t know why the structures don’t give the same arrangement without “pack,” but I don’t think it is important, since the different possible arrangements for a single structure are equally correct.  I hope this helps,

P.S. please send questions to chimera-users rather than to me individually - thanks

> Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Smith Liu" <smith_liu123 at 163.com>
> Subject: Fw:Re: [Chimera-users] on chimera unit cell function
> Date: January 31, 2017 at 7:01:54 AM PST
> To: meng at cgl.ucsf.edu
> Dear Elaine,
> Related to our previous communication on "on chimera unit cell function" , here I have more to discuss with you.
> Attached 1 was the paper “Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Changes and
> Assembly of the AAA ATPase SKD1/VPS4B” published in Traffic 2008. PDB ID 2ZAM, 2ZAN, 2ZAO were 3 pdbs from this paper, and 2ZAM was the VPS4B without any nucleotide, 2ZAN was the VPS4B bound with ATP, 2ZAO as the VPS4B bound with ADP.
> As the paper wrote, “Because our attempts to crystallize SKD1 (VPS4B) in the presence
> of ATP or ADP failed, we soaked the apo form crystals in solutions of ATP or ADP”, thus the 2ZAN and 2ZAO were got by soaking the crystal for 2ZAM with ATP and ADP separately. All 3 crystals were with space group P 65.
> The pdb for the 6 mates for each of 2ZAM, 2ZAN and 2ZAO are attached in attachment 2, 3, 4 separately (prepared without clicking ""Pack molecules in unit cell"). If viewed by Chimera, you will find the mates of 2ZAM arrange in the same way as the mates of 2ZAO, i.e., the 6 mates connect each other closely (side by side) and packed in a screw way.  However for the 6 mates of 2ZAN, although still in screw way, the 6 mates arrange not closely but have a space between the adjacent mates. Correspondingly, the diameters of the z-axis projection of the 6 mates of 2ZAM and 2ZAO were much smaller than that of the 6 mates of 2ZAN.
> However, if we by Chimera we click the "Pack molecules in unit cell",we will find the 6 mates of 2ZAN displayed exactly (or very similarly) as the 6 mates of 2ZAM and 2ZAO (Am I right).
> Then my question would be, in the crystal for 2ZAN and 2ZAO, do the proteins arranged in exactly the same pattern? And why if we did not click ""Pack molecules in unit cell", the mates of 2ZAN and 2ZAO were displayed differently, and with clicking ""Pack molecules in unit cell",the mates of 2ZAN and 2ZAO were displayed similarly?
> If the protein arranged differently in the crystal for 2ZAN and 2ZAO, then in the crystal packing of 2ZAN, how can I identify the 6 protein which were from the 6 screwed mates in 2ZAM?
> I am looking forward to getting a reply from you.
> Smith
> -------- Forwarding messages --------
> From: "Elaine Meng" <meng at cgl.ucsf.edu>
> Date: 2017-01-30 04:05:22
> To:  "Smith Liu" <smith_liu123 at 163.com>
> Cc:  "chimera-users at cgl.ucsf.edu BB" <chimera-users at cgl.ucsf.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Chimera-users] on chimera unit cell function
> Hi Smith,
> The number of copies and their positions are all correct no matter whether you choose the “pack” option or not.  If you cut out a part of the real crystal, there will be a real copy in the same place as the copy from Chimera.  So imagine if you had specified an infinite (or large) number of unit cells in Chimera, a chunk from the middle of the result would look the same as some chunk of the real idealized crystal, regardless of whether you used “pack”.  However, since you are probably specifying 1 x 1 x 1 or some small number of unit cells, yes choose the “pack” option to show the copies packed together, instead of with some spaces where a copy is shown inside a neighboring box rather than in the central outline box.
> Best,
> Elaine
> > On Jan 29, 2017, at 5:10 AM, Smith Liu <smith_liu123 at 163.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Dear Elaine,
> > 
> > I am still confusing on the function of "Pack molecules in unit cell" in Chimera. If we cut out a cube (or a volume) of crystal based on which a pdb was got, do you think the molecules packed in the cube in the way without "Pack molecules in unit cell" clicked, or the molecules packed in the cube in the way with "Pack molecules in unit cell" clicked?
> > 
> > I am looking forward to getting a reply from you.
> > 
> > Smith
> > 
> > 
> > At 2017-01-29 00:50:44, "Elaine Meng" <meng at cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:
> > >Hi Smith,
> > >It is my understanding that you will get the same number of copies whether or not you choose the “pack” option, and that there are multiple equally correct ways in which the copies will be positioned according to the symmetry information.  The “pack” option simply chooses, out of these many equally correct alternatives, a configuration that places the centers of all the copies inside one unit cell outline box instead of spreading them out among neighboring boxes.
> > >I hope this helps,
> > >Elaine
> > >-----
> > >Elaine C. Meng, Ph.D.                       
> > >UCSF Computer Graphics Lab (Chimera team) and Babbitt Lab
> > >Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry
> > >University of California, San Francisco
> > > 
> > >> On Jan 28, 2017, at 1:47 AM, Smith Liu <smith_liu123 at 163.com> wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> Dear All,
> > >> 
> > >> In Chimera, we do Tools →Higher-Order Structure→Unit Cell, then what will be the diffenrence if we clicked "Pack molecules in unit cell" in comparison with if we did not click "Pack molecules in unit cell"? Does it mean that what we observed (or what Chimera displayed) if we click "Pack molecules in unit cell" , was really part of what it displayed if we did not click "Pack molecules in unit cell" but we increased the "Number of Cells" significantly?
> > >> 
> > >> I am looking forward to getting a reply from you.
> > >> 
> > >> Smith

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://plato.cgl.ucsf.edu/pipermail/chimera-users/attachments/20170131/3837095b/attachment.html>

More information about the Chimera-users mailing list