[Chimera-users] surface hydrophobicity display
meng at cgl.ucsf.edu
Mon Jan 31 11:16:44 PST 2011
In that paper, they only looked at Coulombic ESP (and its gradient), but one might expect as least as good results with a more sophisticated ESP. However, you (Sumitro) already said that you were using Coulombic rather than the other methods to calculate electrostatic potential.
You can use the "Compute grid" option of Coulombic Surface Coloring to create a grid file, and then do the gradient coloring that Tom describes with the Surface Color tool.
However, that still leaves open the question of whether any ESP gradient is an adequate measure of hydrophobicity.
That J Med Chem 1992 paper is frustrating because it has several graphs where the lines all look the same, so it is hard to tell what is what. Maybe it exists somewhere in color, where you can tell the lines apart, but I only found black and white.
On Jan 31, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Tom Goddard wrote:
> Hi Elaine,
> Occurs to me that if the electric field strength, ie the gradient of the electrostatic potential, is a useful measure similar to hydrophobicity, that can be viewed currently in Chimera with the surface color dialog using color by "volume data gradient norm". You would need the electrostatic potential calculated for instance by APBS or DelPhi.
>> Hi Sumitro,
>> I did a little more digging for related information and thought I would share -- however, none of these methods are available in Chimera currently.
>> ... If I understood it correctly, they looked at how successfully Coulombic electrostatic potential and the gradient in that potential can be used to identify hydrophobic areas of surface (areas that bind hydrophobic atoms in the ligand). Both were somewhat successful, but even better was a simple definition of hydrophobic surface as the part of the surface that is not close to hydrogen-bonding groups. This paper is fairly old and the data set of ligand/receptor structures small.
More information about the Chimera-users